We considered our inspection findings in order to answer the following questions;' Is the service safe?
' Is the service effective?
' Is the service caring?
' Is the service responsive?
' Is the service well-led?
Below is a summary of what we found.
Is the service safe?
There was one person living at the home on the day of our inspection.
The provider had systems in place that identified, assessed and managed risks to the health, safety and welfare of the person who used the service and others.
We noted that the person's records had not been fully updated to reflect their current care needs. A compliance action has been set in relation to this and the provider must tell us how they plan to improve.
The staff we spoke to were all aware of the complaints, safeguarding and whistle blowing procedures. All of the staff said they would immediately report any concerns they had about poor practice and were confident these would be addressed.
We found the house was clean and the person was protected by the systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection. We saw staff were provided with appropriate training to equip them with the skills to meet the person's needs.
Is the service effective?
There were systems in place to ensure the person's health and care needs were assessed with them. We found they were involved in this process. However, we saw that specific care plans were not in place for the individual's particular nutrition needs. A compliance action has been set in relation to this and the provider must tell us how they plan to improve.
Staff training was provided that took account of the needs of the person in the house. For example, we saw training in administration of medicines and challenging behaviour had been provided.
Is the service caring?
We saw staff responded kindly and respectfully to requests from the individual. There was a relaxed atmosphere and we saw there was a good rapport between the person and staff. The person told us, 'The staff are great and I like the house. I am comfortable and I can choose what I want to do.'
The person's preferences, interests, and diverse needs had been recorded, but were not fully recorded in the current care plan. A compliance action has been set in relation to this and the provider must tell us how they plan to improve.
Is the service responsive?
The individual told us they were aware of the complaints procedure and staff could describe how they would assist them to make a complaint. We saw there were systems in place for dealing with and recording complaints.
Staff were aware of safeguarding and whistleblowing procedures and could describe the action to be taken in the event of a safeguarding referral being made.
Is the service well led?
The service had a quality assurance system in place that included the use of surveys from the person who used the service. This meant the individual was able to feed back on their experience and the service was able to learn from this.
Staff had regular supervision and staff meetings which meant they were able to feedback to the management of the home their views and suggestions.
The manager confirmed their views were listened to and account was taken of them. They said they felt well supported by the provider and their representative.