Background to this inspection
Updated
12 February 2015
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection checked whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
This inspection took place on the 27 and 28 October 2014 and was unannounced. We looked to see if outstanding breaches in regulation identified at our inspections in June and August 2014 and the warning notice, issued on the 15 September 2014 had been met. We also looked at other areas of the service to check the provider was meeting the regulations.
The inspection team comprised of two adult social care inspectors. During the inspection we spent time speaking with three people who used the service, three relatives, a visiting health care professional and four staff. We also spoke with the deputy manager and operations manager.
During the inspection we observed how staff supported people in the communal areas. We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a specific way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us. We also looked at people’s care records, staff recruitment and training records as well as information about the management and conduct of the service.
Prior to our inspection CQC had been involved in several multi-agency meetings where current issues and investigations were discussed with the local authority commissioning team, safeguarding team and the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG).
Updated
12 February 2015
Parklands House provides nursing care for up to 57 people whose primary care needs are mental disorder or dementia care. Qualified nurses, supported by care assistants, provide 24-hour nursing care. At the time of our inspection there were 35 people living at the home.
This was an unannounced inspection carried out over two days, 27 and 28 October 2014. During this inspection we looked to see if outstanding breaches in regulation and the warning notice, issued on the 15 September 2014 had been met. We also looked at other areas of the service to check the provider was meeting the regulations.
The home has no registered manager. ‘A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.’
People’s safety was being put at risk as the medicine management system did not demonstrate people received their medication as prescribed. We found there was a breach of Regulation 13 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.
Suitable arrangements to effectively maintain hygiene standards within the home and minimise the risk of cross infections were poor. We found there was a breach of Regulation 12 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.
Where people’s freedom was being restricted the management team had sought appropriate advice and support so that decisions could be made in people’s ‘best interests’. This helped to ensure people were protected. Accurate records about the individual support needs of people were not maintained. Care records did not reflect how people were being restricted, how risks were managed or reflect their changing health needs. We found there was a breach of Regulation 20 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.
People were not always able to tell staff if they needed help. People were reliant on staff to identify any change in their health and well-being and seek appropriate help and advice. We saw where people had lost a significant amount of weight loss, this had not been acted upon. This could result in people’s healthcare needs not being met. We found there was a breach of Regulation 9 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.
People did not receive care and support that was delivered in a dignified and timely manner. Visitors to the service told us they had witnessed people having to wait for assistance and they looked unkempt. They said people were left without staff supervision and had to seek out staff when people needed assistance. We saw staff did not always provide meaningful interactions with people. We found there was a breach of Regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.
People were not always supported by sufficient numbers of staff to keep them safe. Due to the turnover in staff there had been a reliance on agency staff to support people. We found these staff were not aware of the individual needs of people. We found there was a breach of Regulation 22 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.
Systems to monitor the quality of the service were not robust. Where audits had been completed and areas of improvement had been identified, the provider could not show us that appropriate action had been taken to improve the quality of service people received so that they were kept safe. This put people at risk of harm or injury. We found there was a breach of Regulation 10 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.
Effective management arrangements providing clear leadership and support for staff were not in place. New staff spoke positively about working at the home and the support they had received from colleagues. However existing staff had not received updated training and support in areas specific to the needs of people living at Parklands House. We found there was a breach of Regulation 23 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.
Staff recruitment processes had improved however not all checks about the suitability of staff had been completed prior to them commencing work. This puts people at risk of being cared for by staff that are unsuitable to work with vulnerable people. We found there was a breach of Regulation 21 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010.
People told us they liked living at the home and liked the staff. They told us they enjoyed the food and maintained relationships with family and friends. Improvements were needed so that people were effectively supported or encouraged to take part in activities specific to their needs and abilities.