• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Dexter Close

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

44 Dexter Close, Grays, Essex, RM17 5AU (01375) 396497

Provided and run by:
South Essex Special Needs Housing Association Limited

All Inspections

3 March 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Dexter Close is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to two people with learning disabilities. At the time of the inspection two people were living in the service.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People were not always protected from the risk of infection. The provider had not followed government guidelines to minimise the risk of infection from COVID-19. During the inspection we found staff did not always wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and there were no infection prevention and control policies in place to support staff knowledge.

The provider did not have robust systems in place to ensure they had oversight of the safety and quality of the service and staff had not always received relevant, up to date training to support them in their roles.

People were supported by a consistent staff team and there were enough staff on duty to meet people’s needs. Staff were safely recruited.

Staff told us they felt supported by the registered manager and were able to raise concerns. Relatives were involved in people’s care and were kept updated throughout the pandemic.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was Good (published 11 January 2018)

Why we inspected

We had concerns in relation to infection prevention and control processes in the service. As a result, we undertook a focused inspection to review the key questions of safe and well-led only.

We reviewed the information we held about the service. No areas of concern were identified in the other key questions. We therefore did not inspect them. Ratings from previous comprehensive inspections for those key questions were used in calculating the overall rating at this inspection.

The overall rating for the service has changed from Good to Requires improvement. This is based on the findings at this inspection.

We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvement. Please see the Safe and Well-Led sections of this report.

You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the end of this full report.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Dexter Close on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Enforcement

We are mindful of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our regulatory function. This meant we took account of the exceptional circumstances arising as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic when considering what enforcement action was necessary and proportionate to keep people safe as a result of this inspection. We will continue to discharge our regulatory enforcement functions required to keep people safe and to hold providers to account where it is necessary for us to do so.

We have identified breaches in relation to infection prevention and control and the oversight of the service. Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.

Follow up

We will request an action plan for the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

17 November 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on the 17 and 20 November 2017 and was unannounced. The inspection team consisted of one inspector. The previous inspection took place in October 2015 and the service was rated Good overall. This service was inspected at the same time as the provider’s other service which is very similar to this service. Both services are with five minutes’ drive from each other and managed by the same registered manager. Some areas of the reports will contain some similarities as we spoke to the same staff during our inspections of both services.

Dexter close is a residential home registered to provide personal care and accommodation for two people with learning disabilities and on the autism spectrum. The service is a house located in Grays, Essex. Each person has a single room and there is a communal bathroom, shower room, kitchen, dining room and lounge. There is a rear enclosed garden at the back of the house with level access. At the time of our inspection there were two people using the service.

The care service has been developed and designed in line with the values that underpin the Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These values include choice, promotion of independence and inclusion. People with learning disabilities and autism using the service can live as ordinary a life as any citizen. Registering the Right Support CQC policy.

A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The service was safe. The service’s recruitment process ensured that appropriate checks were carried out before staff commenced employment. There were sufficient staff on duty to meet the needs of people and keep them safe from potential harm or abuse. People’s health and wellbeing needs were assessed and reviewed to minimise risk to health. People’s medication was managed well and records of administration were kept up to date.

The service was effective. People were cared for and supported by staff who had received training to support people and to meet their needs. The registered manager had a good understanding of their responsibilities in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. People were supported to eat and drink enough as to ensure they maintained a balanced diet and referrals to health and social care services was made when required.

The service was caring. Staff cared for people in an empathetic and kind manner. Staff had a good understanding of people’s preferences of care. Staff always worked hard to promote people’s independence through encouraging and supporting people to make informed decisions.

The service was responsive. Records we viewed showed people and their relatives were involved in the planning and review of their care. Care plans were reviewed on a regular basis and also when there was a change in care needs. People were supported to follow their interests and participate in social activities. The service responded to complaints received in a timely manner.

The service was well-led. Staff and people spoke very highly of the registered manager and the provider who they informed to be supportive and worked hard to provide an exceptional service. The service had systems in place to monitor and provide good care and these were reviewed on a regular basis.

22 October 2015

During a routine inspection

The unannounced inspection took place on the 22 October 2015.

Dexter Close provides accommodation and support for up to two people living with on-going learning disability.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff delivered support effectively and care was provided in a way that intended to promote people’s independence and wellbeing, whilst people’s safety was ensured. Staff were recruited and employed upon completion of appropriate checks as part of a robust recruitment process. Sufficient members of staff enabled people’s individual needs to be met adequately. Qualified staff dispensed medications and monitored people’s health satisfactorily.

Staff understood their responsibilities and how to keep people safe. People’s rights were also protected because management and staff understood the framework of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS).

People were given support and advice regarding purchasing and cooking food, which allowed an informed choice to be made by each individual. Staff and manager ensured access to healthcare services were readily available to people and worked with a range of health professionals, such as social workers, community mental health nurses and GPs; to implement care and support plans.

Staff were respectful and compassionate towards people ensuring privacy and dignity was valued. People were supported in a person centred way by staff who understood their roles in relation to encouraging independence whilst mitigating potential risks. People were supported to identify their own interests and pursue them with the assistance of staff. These person centred activities took place within the service as well as in the community.

Systems were in place to make sure that people’s views were gathered. These included regular meetings, direct interactions with people and questionnaires being distributed to people, relatives and healthcare professionals. The service was assisted to run effectively by the use of quality monitoring audits the manager carried out, which identified any improvements needed. A complaints procedure was in place and has been implemented appropriately by management.

23 July 2013

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with told us that they were content and well cared for at Dexter Close.

We saw that care and treatment for each person was planned and reviewed with their involvement and consent as far as possible. Risks to the health, welfare and safety of people using the service were identified and managed.

People enjoyed the food provided at the service and were able to exercise choice about what they ate and drank.

People's medicines were managed safely by competent staff. However, further improvements would ensure better storage arrangements and management.

Staff were recruited safely. Staff were also trained and supported to care for people properly and to keep them safe.

9 May 2012

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with told us that they were satisfied with the staff and what they did each day. They told us that they knew what was in their support plan and were involved in deciding daily routines and the way their rooms were furnished and decorated. People told us that staff supported them in accessing the local and wider community, so that they could take part in their chosen interests and activities. People also told us that they were satisfied with staff attitudes towards them.