Background to this inspection
Updated
8 February 2022
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.
As part of CQC's response to care homes with outbreaks of COVID-19, we are conducting reviews to ensure that the Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) practice is safe and that services are compliant with IPC measures. This was a targeted inspection looking at the IPC practices the provider has in place. We also asked the provider about any staffing pressures the service was experiencing and whether this was having an impact on the service.
This inspection took place on 19 January 2022 and was unannounced.
Updated
8 February 2022
This inspection took place on 24 August 2018 and was unannounced. A second day of inspection took place on 21 September 2018 and was announced. There was a delay in us returning for the second day of inspection as the registered manager (who was also one of the providers) had been absent unavoidably.
Kaydar Residential is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.
This service provides personal care for up to eight people with a learning disability and/or autistic spectrum disorder. The care service has been developed and designed in line with the values that underpin the Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These values include choice, promotion of independence and inclusion. People with learning disabilities and autism using the service can live as ordinary a life as any citizen. On the days of our inspection there were seven people using the service.
The service had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
We last inspected the service in April 2017 and rated the service as 'Good' overall. At this inspection we found the service remained Good.
Staff knew how to keep people safe and prevent harm from occurring. Staff had completed training in safeguarding vulnerable adults and understood their responsibilities to report any concerns. Thorough recruitment and selection procedures ensured suitable staff were employed. Risk assessments relating to people's individual care needs and the environment were reviewed regularly. Medicines were managed safely and administered by staff trained for this role.
Staff received appropriate training and support. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People were supported to have enough to eat and drink and attend appointments with healthcare professionals.
Staff provided care and support with kindness and compassion. There were positive interactions between people and staff. People could make choices about how they wanted to be supported and staff listened to what they had to say. People's independence was promoted and encouraged. There was a welcoming and homely atmosphere at the service.
People received support which was person-centred and responsive to their needs. Detailed support plans were in place which guided staff how people wished and needed to be supported with daily living. People who received support, or where appropriate their relatives, were involved in decisions about their care.
People spoke positively about the registered manager and the providers, who visited the service often. There was a positive ethos and culture which was led by the management team. There was an effective quality assurance system in place to ensure the quality of the service and drive improvement.
Further information is in the detailed findings below.