• Care Home
  • Care home

Glenview

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

54 Gravel Hill, Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 1QS (01584) 876262

Provided and run by:
MacIntyre Care

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 8 March 2022

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

As part of CQC’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic we are looking at how services manage infection control and visiting arrangements. This was a targeted inspection looking at the infection prevention and control measures the provider had in place. We also asked the provider about any staffing pressures the service was experiencing and whether this was having an impact on the service.

This inspection took place on Monday 21 February 2022 and was announced. We gave the service 24 hours’ notice of the inspection.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 8 March 2022

Glenview is registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to people six people who have learning disabilities. At the time of our inspection five people were living there.

A registered manager was in post but owing to pre-arranged annual leave was not available on day one of this inspection. However, the registered manager was present during day two. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At the last inspection the service was rated good. At this inspection we found the service remained good.

People continued to remain safe as staff knew how to recognise and respond to concerns of ill-treatment and abuse. There were enough staff to support people to meet their needs. The provider followed safe recruitment procedures when employing new staff members.

The provider followed infection prevention and control guidance. The equipment that people used was maintained and kept in safe working order.

The provider learnt from incidents and accidents and worked with people and families to minimise the risk of reoccurrence if things had gone wrong.

People continued to receive care that was effective and personalised to their individual needs and preferences. They were assisted by a staff team who were well supported and had the skills and training to effectively assist people.

People were supported to have choice and control over their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible. Staff were aware of current guidance which informed their practice and people’s rights were protected by the staff who supported them.

People received support that continued to be caring and respectful. People were supported by a staff team that was compassionate, thoughtful and kind.

People’s privacy and dignity was respected by those providing assistance. People were supported at times of upset and distress.

People, and those close to them, continued to be involved in developing their own care and support plans. When changes occurred in people’s personal and medical circumstances, these plans were reviewed to reflect these changes. People’s individual preferences were known by staff members who supported them as they wished. People and their relatives were encouraged to raise any concerns or complaints. The provider had systems in place to address any issues raised with them.

Glenview continued to be well-led by a management team that people and staff found approachable and supportive. People were involved in decisions about their care and support and their suggestions were valued by the provider. Staff members believed their opinions and ideas were listened to by the provider and, if appropriate, implemented. The provider had systems in place to monitor the quality of service they provided and where necessary made changes to drive improvements.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.