23 November 2016
During a routine inspection
Little Havens Children’s Hospice is registered to provide respite and end of life care for up to eight children or young people, aged between 0 and 19 years of age who have a life limiting or life threatening illness and who live in Essex and the surrounding London Boroughs. Support is also provided for families of the children and young people who use the service. Family accommodation is provided on the first floor and includes bedrooms and an open plan communal lounge, dining area and adjoining kitchen.
There was a registered manager in post. However, at the time of the inspection the registered manager was not at work and as a result of this, an interim manager from within the organisation was managing the service on a day-to-day basis. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
Parents told us the service was a safe place for their child or young person to access. Parents told us they had no concerns about their child’s or young person’s safety and were confident that the arrangements in place would keep their child safe. Staff were able to demonstrate a good understanding and knowledge of a child’s or young person’s specific support needs, so as to ensure their and others’ safety. Staff understood the risks and signs of potential abuse and the relevant safeguarding processes to follow.
Parents told us there were always sufficient staff available to meet their child’s or young person’s needs. Suitable arrangements were in place to ensure that the numbers and skills of the staff team were effective in meeting the needs and complex needs of children and young people using the service. Appropriate arrangements were in place to recruit staff and volunteers safely so as to ensure they were suitable to work with and support children in their care.
Medicines were safely stored, recorded and administered in line with current guidance to ensure children and young people received their prescribed medicines. This meant that they received their prescribed medicines as they should and in a safe way.
Children and young people benefitted from a staff team that were well trained to meet the complex and specialised needs of children and young people using the service. We saw from their interactions, facial expressions and mannerisms that children and young people were contented, comfortable and relaxed in staffs company. Staff were seen to be warm and caring towards the children and young people they supported and were treated with compassion. Parents confirmed that they, their child or young person was also treated with respect and had their privacy and dignity upheld at all times.
The dining experience for people was positive. Mealtimes were family orientated with children, young people, their families and staff eating together. Children’s and young people’s dietary needs were recorded and where complex nutritional needs were being managed, staff networked with community based services and professionals.
Young people were involved in decisions about their care and treatment. Staff had a good understanding and awareness of the importance of gaining consent when providing care and treatment and working within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). This meant that the rights of young people were promoted and protected where they were unable to make their own decisions.
Care plans accurately reflected the child’s or young person’s care and support needs and they received appropriate support to have their social care needs met. Parents told us that their child’s healthcare needs were well managed. Suitable arrangements were in place to ensure children and young people experienced a comfortable and pain free death. Where appropriate advanced care planning had been considered and discussed and this included the child’s, young person’s and parents’ wishes and choices. Families received appropriate bereavement support.
There was an effective system in place to regularly assess and monitor the quality of the service provided. The provider was able to demonstrate how they measured and analysed the care provided to children and young people, and how this ensured that the service was operating safely and was continually improving to meet their needs. Feedback about the hospice, the services and facilities it provided were actively encouraged and sought. Parents were aware of how to raise any concerns if needed to. Many positive compliments had been made about the service.