Birch Hill Care Centre is located in the village of Norham, close to the border between Scotland and Northumberland. It provides care for up to 24 older people, some of whom have dementia. There were 22 people using the service at the time of the inspection.The inspection took place on 29 December 2015 and was unannounced.
The service was inspected in October 2013. At the time we found that people were not protected against the risk of unsafe or inappropriate care because accurate and appropriate records were not kept. At a follow up inspection in March 2014 we found that this regulation had been met.
There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People told us they felt safe. There were safeguarding policies and procedures in place and staff knew what action to take if abuse was suspected. They had received training relating to the protection of vulnerable adults. There were no ongoing safeguarding concerns and this was confirmed by the local authority safeguarding adults officer.
Risk assessments were carried out to ensure that people were protected whilst supporting them to remain as independent as possible. These included risks relating to their physical and psychological health, and assessments were reviewed regularly. Accidents and incidents were recorded and acted upon appropriately.
We saw that the building was well maintained and clean. Staff were aware of infection control procedures and had received regular training. Environmental risk assessments were carried out and safety checks of the building and equipment were completed on a regular basis. Emergency contingency plans were in place in the event of damage to the building or due to inclement weather.
People, staff and relatives told us there were enough staff to meet people’s needs. This was confirmed by our own observations. There was a training programme in place. Staff were trained in safe working practices and to meet the specific needs of people who lived at Birch Hill. This included additional training in dementia care and supporting people experiencing behavioural disturbance or distress.
Safe recruitment procedures were followed which meant that people were protected from harm. New staff completed induction and mandatory training prior to commencing work and then shadowed experienced staff. It was an expectation that all would complete their Care Certificate. New staff said they felt well supported and a staff handbook was provided.
Medicines were managed safely. Procedures for the safe administration of medicines were in place and regular audits were carried out. Staff had received training in medicines management and their competency had been assessed regularly by a registered nurse to ensure they were able to administer medicines safely.
People and visitors told us, and our observations confirmed that people were well cared for. Staff spoke kindly with people and privacy and dignity was respected. We saw that staff had received the necessary training to deliver care competently. A consent policy was in place and staff told us that the consent of people was always sought prior to any care being delivered.
CQC monitors the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). DoLS are part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). These safeguards aim to make sure that people are looked after in a way that does not inappropriately restrict their freedom. The registered manager had submitted DoLS applications to the local authority for authorisation. Assessments of mental capacity had been carried out but the outcome was not always clear.
People told us that they were happy with the meals provided at the home. Menus were reviewed and rotated regularly. People were consulted about their food likes and dislikes. We observed a mealtime and saw that people were supported sensitively with eating and drinking, and that their dignity was maintained. Nutritional risk assessments were carried out and regularly reviewed.
We found that people were able to access a range of healthcare services and health concerns were acted upon promptly, with appropriate advice sought. Visiting professionals spoke highly of the service and staff.
The premises were adapted to meet the needs of people using the service. A new stair lift had been installed, in addition to the passenger lift. A safe internal courtyard garden was available to allow freedom of movement and to maximise independence while reducing risks to safety. We saw that some attention had been paid to dementia friendly design but found that there could be some improvements.
We observed that staff were caring. We saw that staff spoke kindly to people and were respectful and courteous. People and relatives told us that staff were caring. The provider had developed a booklet about how to support people with dementia. This was an example of best practice.
We read care four care plans and spoke with staff about the care available to people. Care plans were personalised, detailed and were reviewed monthly. The service had signed up to a dementia pledge run by the provider organisation. A booklet had been developed by the provider about how to support people with dementia. This was available to relatives and friends and was an example of best practice.
A varied programme of activities was in place and regular trips were planned using the service’s mini bus.
End of life care was good and we received positive feedback from a relative and district nursing services regarding the care provided.
There was a complaints procedure in place which was prominently displayed. The registered manager told us that no complaints had been received. There were a number of feedback mechanisms to obtain the views from people, relatives and staff. These included meetings and surveys.
The registered manager carried out a number of audits and checks to monitor the quality of the service. The provider also arranged regular quality monitoring checks by a senior manager employed by the organisation to ensure high standards of care were maintained.