Background to this inspection
Updated
26 February 2020
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team
The inspection was completed by one inspector.
Service and service type
Shipley Lodge is a care home. People in care homes receive accommodation and personal care. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
This inspection was unannounced.
What we did before the inspection
We used information we held about the home which included notifications that they sent us to plan this inspection. On this occasion the provider had not been asked to complete a Provider Information Return (PIR). This is information we require providers to send us at least once annually to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. However, we gave opportunities for them to update us throughout the inspection.
During the inspection
We spoke with five people who used the service about their experience of the care provided. We also spoke with five members of staff including the registered manager, the deputy manager, support workers and a student on placement. We also spoke with one visiting professional.
We reviewed a range of records. These included five people’s care records and several medication records. We looked at one staff file in relation to recruitment and staff supervision. A variety of records relating to the management of the service, including audits, were reviewed.
After the inspection
We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We looked at training data and the service improvement plan.
Updated
26 February 2020
About the service
Shipley Lodge is a residential care home providing personal and nursing care to 16 people with mental health support needs. On the day of our inspection there were 14 people living there. The home is in a residential area with good access to community facilities.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
The risks to people’s health and wellbeing were assessed and action agreed with the person to try to reduce them. There were systems to learn from mistakes including the detailed analysis of accidents and incidents. People were supported by staff who understood how to protect them from avoidable harm. There were enough staff deployed to keep people safe in the home and when they chose to go out. People’s medicines were well managed, and staff understood how to reduce the risk of the spread of infection.
Staff received training to enable them to do their jobs well. Assessment ensured people were supported to transition into the service well. People were supported to maintain a healthy diet and encouraged to participate in preparing new choices. Their health and welfare were managed with referrals to other professionals when required. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
There were kind and caring relationships between people and staff which were based on dignity and respect. People were central to decisions about the support they received and staff respected their wishes. People had care and support provided which met their preferences. Complaints were handled in line with the provider’s complaints policy. People did not currently receive end of life care.
Staff enjoyed working at the service and felt respected and valued. The provider’s quality assurance processes were effective in identifying potential risks to people’s safety. There was a continued focus on learning, development and improvement.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk
Rating at last inspection
The last rating for this service was good (published 22 July 2017)
Why we inspected
This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.
Follow up
We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.