Background to this inspection
Updated
7 April 2021
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
As part of this inspection we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.
Inspection team
The inspection was carried out by one inspector and a specialist nurse advisor with extensive knowledge and experience in many fields including older person's care and dementia.
Service and service type
Marian House is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
This inspection was unannounced.
What we did before the inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service. We sought feedback from the local authority and professionals who work with the service.
We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections.
During the inspection
We spoke with two people who used the service and three relatives about their experience of the care provided. We also used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experiences of people who could not talk with us.
We spoke with seven members of staff including the registered managing, deputy manager and care workers.
We looked at six people's care records to see how their care was planned and delivered, including pre-assessment records and risk assessments. Other records we looked at included accident and incident records, safeguarding, complaints and compliments. We also looked at staff scheduling records, management of medication and the provider's audits, quality assurance, infection control procedures and overview information about the service.
After the inspection
We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We looked at safeguarding and quality assurance records.
Updated
7 April 2021
About the service
Marian House Nursing Home is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. The home is registered to provide accommodation and nursing care for up to 42 older people. There were 40 people living in the home at the time of our inspection visit.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
The provider had safeguarding systems and processes in place to keep people safe. Staff knew the risks to
people and followed the assessments to ensure they met people's needs. People felt safe and were supported by staff who knew how to protect them from avoidable harm.
Staff were recruited safely and there were enough staff to meet people's needs. Staff followed the infection control procedures the provider had in place. Risks to people's health and well-being had been assessed and monitored to ensure they were kept safe. People received their medication as prescribed.
The provider had quality assurance systems with competency checks of staff completed regularly. The registered manager understood their legal responsibilities in regard to safeguarding and notifications. The provider worked with other professionals such as district nurses and GP's to ensure care needs were met.
People and their relatives told us the service was well-led. They told us the management team and staff were good. Provider feedback processes had been used to gather information about the views of people, their relatives and stakeholders about the service provision.
Staff spoke positively about working for the provider. They felt well supported and that they could talk to the management team at any time, feeling confident any concerns would be acted on promptly. They felt valued and happy in their role.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk
Rating at last inspection
The last rating for this service was good (published 19 April 2018).
Why we inspected
We received concerns in relation the management of safeguarding incidents. A decision was made for us to inspect and examine those risks. As a result, we undertook a focused inspection to review the key questions of Safe and Well-Led only. We found no evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from this concern.
We reviewed the information we held about the service. No areas of concern were identified in the other key questions. We therefore did not inspect them. Ratings from previous comprehensive inspections for those key questions were used in calculating the overall rating at this inspection. Please see the Safe and Well-Led sections of this full report.
Follow up
We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.