16 May 2019
During a routine inspection
Care With Compassion is registered to provide care to younger adults, older people and people with dementia, physical disability, sensory impairment and learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder.
People’s experience of using this service:
The registered manager did not clearly understand their role in relation to the completion of mental capacity assessments and best interest decisions for people that lack capacity. However, we found that people were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
The strength of each medicine was not recorded on the administration page of the medicines administration record (MAR) which put people at risk of receiving the wrong medicine dosage. We made a recommendation for the service to review all MAR records and add the strength of medicines on the administration page.
The service had not sought pharmacy advice when administering medicines hidden in food. This meant staff may not understand how giving medicines with food may affect how the body absorbs the medicine.
Staff received training prior to giving people their medicines and people received their medicines on time.
The registered manager had a good overview of the service and was in regular contact with people receiving care and their relatives.
The service displayed CQC’s rating of performance at their business location and on their website.
People were supported by staff that were kind and caring, their privacy and dignity was respected.
People were supported by staff that had been safely recruited and had adequate training to meet their needs.
Risks associated with people falling and moving around their home environment had been identified and care plans were reviewed regularly and updated as and when people’s needs changed. Staff understood risks associated with people’s healthcare conditions.
People were supported to eat and drink enough. Their choices were respected, and they were in control of their care.
People’s independence was promoted, and they received individualised support from staff that knew them well.
Concerns were promptly responded to and people knew the management team by name.
The service met the characteristics for a rating of ‘requires improvement’’ in two of the five key questions we inspected and a rating of ‘good’ in three. Therefore, our overall rating for the service after this inspection was ‘requires improvement’.
Rating at last inspection: Good (Report published 18 October 2016).
Why we inspected: This was a scheduled inspection based on the previous rating.
Follow up: Going forward we will continue to monitor this service and plan to inspect in line with our re-inspection schedule for those services rated Good.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk