• Care Home
  • Care home

Healthlinc Apartments

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Cliff Road, Welton, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN2 3JN (01673) 861775

Provided and run by:
Elysium Healthcare (Healthlinc) Limited

All Inspections

7 February 2022

During a routine inspection

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

About the service

Healthlinc Apartments is a residential care service providing nursing and personal care for up to seven people who live with a learning disability. Some people may also require support with mental health, sensory or physical needs. There were five people living in the service at the time of the inspection. Healthlinc Apartments is one of three registered services on the same site.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The provider’s management systems were not robust enough to demonstrate effective oversight of the quality of the service. There was a lack of distinction between two registered services on site. The provider had not fully acknowledged the impact of the high use of agency staff on people and staff. Staff lacked confidence in the provider. Audits had taken place but needed minor improvements regarding action plans.

People were supported by enough staff. However, regular deployment of agency staff meant there was a lack of meaningful interaction between people and those agency staff. Staff understood their responsibilities to keep people safe. People’s medicines were managed safely and reviewed frequently. Measures were in place to reduce the risk of infection to people.

People were supported to take part in activities which were important to them. However, people’s opportunities were impacted when being supported by agency staff who did not know them well. Information was available to people in different methods depending on their needs and preferences. The provider had a policy to effectively manage complaints.

Staff received training relevant to their role. People’s care records reflected their current needs and assessment tools were used to monitor people’s on-going support. People were supported with eating and drinking and staff supported people with different aspects of their daily living. The service and facilities met people’s needs. People had access to on-going healthcare support. People’s mental capacity had been formally assessed and best interests decisions were in place where required.

People were encouraged to express themselves freely using their preferred communication method. Staff treated people with dignity and respect. Staff and people were involved in the running of the service and their views were sought.

Right Culture

There was a lack of visible leadership from the service manager. Agency staff use was high, and this resulted in people not always receiving consistent care from staff who knew them well. People and those important to them were involved in planning their care. Permanent staff placed people’s wishes, needs and rights at the heart of everything they did.

Right Support

Staff supported people to have maximum possible choice and control over their own lives. The service gave people care and support in a safe, clean and well-maintained environment that met their sensory and physical needs. People had a choice about their living environment and were able to personalise their rooms. Staff supported people to make decisions following best practice in decision-making. Staff supported people with their medicines in a way that and achieved the best possible health outcome.

Right Care

Staff promoted equality and diversity in their support for people. Staff protected and respected people’s privacy and dignity. They understood and responded to their individual needs. Staff understood how to protect people from poor care and abuse. The service worked well with other agencies to do so. Staff had training on how to recognise and report abuse and they knew how to apply it. People could communicate with staff and understand information given to them because staff supported them consistently and understood their individual communication needs.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 21 May 2021).

Why we inspected

We undertook this inspection to assess that the service is applying the principles of Right support, right care, right culture.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvements. Please see the Safe, Responsive and Well-led sections of this full report.

Enforcement

We have identified a breach in relation to the provider’s oversight of the quality of the service at this inspection.

Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.

Follow up

We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

5 May 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Healthlinc Apartments are a residential care service providing personal and nursing care for up to seven people who live with a learning disability. Some people may also require support with mental health, sensory or physical needs. There were six people living in the service at the time of our inspection.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People told us they felt safe with the staff who supported them. Staff understood how to identify and report any concerns for people’s health, safety and welfare.

Risks were assessed and management plans were in place to minimise the impact on people’s health, safety and welfare. Risks were regularly reviewed and any changes in people's needs were quickly responded to.

Measures were in place to prevent the spread of infection in the service. Medicines were managed safely.

There were enough, safely recruited staff to meet people's individual needs and wishes. Staff were provided with training and support to help them deliver good quality care for people.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability the choices, dignity, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Right Support, right care, right culture is the statutory guidance which supports CQC to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people.

This service was able to demonstrate how they were meeting the underpinning principles of Right support, right care, right culture. People, and those who were important to them, were involved in planning their care so that the way they lived their life reflected their choices and wishes.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

There was an open and inclusive culture within the service. Everyone’s views were listened to and respected. The manager and staff worked in partnership with other health and social care professionals for the benefit of people who lived in the service.

Systems were in place monitor the quality of the services provided for people. This enabled any gaps or shortfalls to be identified and addressed in a timely way and promoted a culture of continuous improvement.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 18 December 2017).

Why we inspected

The inspection was prompted in part due to concerns received about staff deployment. A decision was made for us to inspect and examine those risks.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

We reviewed the information we held about the service. No areas of concern were identified in the other key questions. We therefore did not inspect them. Ratings from previous comprehensive inspections for those key questions were used in calculating the overall rating at this inspection.

The overall rating for the service has remained good. This is based on the findings at this inspection.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

15 November 2017

During a routine inspection

Healthlinc Apartments are registered to provide accommodation, nursing and personal care for seven people who may be younger adults or older people. The service can provide care for people who have a sensory or physical disability. It can also support people who have special needs for assistance due to a learning disability or mental health issues. There were seven people living in the service at the time of our inspection visit. Most of the people had special communication needs and used a combination of individual words, vocal tones and sign assisted language to express themselves.

The service was run by a company who was the registered provider. There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run. In this report when we speak about both the company and the registered manager we refer to them as being, ‘the registered persons’.

At the last inspection on 1 December 2015 the service was rated, ‘Good’.

At this inspection we found the service remained, ‘Good’.

In more detail, there were systems, processes and practices to safeguard people from situations in which they may experience abuse. Risks to people’s safety had been assessed, monitored and managed so they were supported to stay safe while their freedom was respected. In addition, medicines were managed safely.

Suitable arrangements had been made to ensure that sufficient numbers of suitable staff were deployed in the service and background checks had been completed before new nurses and care staff had been appointed. Good standards of hygiene were being maintained and lessons had been learnt when things had gone wrong.

Nurses and care staff had been supported to deliver care in line with current best practice guidance. People enjoyed their meals and were supported to eat and drink enough to maintain a balanced diet. In addition, there was suitable provision to ensure that people received coordinated and person-centred care when they used or moved between different services.

People had been supported to live healthier lives by having suitable access to healthcare services so that they received on-going healthcare support. Furthermore, people had benefited from the accommodation being adapted, designed and decorated in a way that met their needs and expectations.

Suitable arrangements had been made to obtain consent to care and treatment in line with legislation and guidance.

People were treated with kindness, respect and compassion and they were given emotional support when needed. They were also supported to express their views about the care they received and to be actively involved in making decisions about things that affected them. This included having access to lay advocates if necessary. In addition, confidential information was kept private.

People received personalised care that was responsive to their needs. This included being offered a number of opportunities to pursue their hobbies and interests. People’s concerns and complaints were listened and responded to in order to improve the quality of care. In addition, suitable provision had been made to support people at the end of their life to have a comfortable, dignified and pain-free death.

There was a positive culture in the service that was open, inclusive and focused upon achieving good outcomes for people. There was a robust management framework to ensure that nurses and care staff understood their responsibilities so that risks and regulatory requirements were met.

The views of people who lived in the service, relatives and staff had been gathered and acted on to shape any improvements that were made. Quality checks had been completed and people benefited from the service being able to quickly put problems right and to innovate so that people could consistently receive safe care.

Good team work was promoted and nurses and care staff were supported to speak out if they had any concerns about people not being treated in the right way. In addition, the registered persons worked in partnership with other agencies to support the development of joined-up care.

1 December 2015

During a routine inspection

This was an announced inspection carried out on 1 December 2015.

Healthlinc Apartments can provide accommodation and nursing care for seven people who have a learning disability. There were five people living in the service at the time of our inspection. Some of the people living in the service had special communication needs and used a combination of words, signs and gestures to express themselves.

There was a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff knew how to respond to any concerns that might arise so that people were kept safe from harm. People were helped to promote their wellbeing, steps had been taken to reduce the risk of accidents and medicines were safely managed. There were enough staff on duty and background checks had been completed before new staff were appointed.

Staff had received training and guidance and they knew how to care for people in the right way. This included how to respond to people who had special communication needs. People had received all of the healthcare assistance they needed.

Staff had ensured that people’s rights were respected by helping them to make decisions for themselves. The Care Quality Commission is required by law to monitor how registered persons apply the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and to report on what we find. These safeguards protect people when they are not able to make decisions for themselves and it is necessary to deprive them of their liberty in order to keep them safe. In relation to this, the registered manager had worked with the relevant local authorities to ensure that people only received lawful care that respected their rights.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff recognised people’s right to privacy, respected confidential information and promoted people’s dignity.

People had received all of the care they needed including people who could become distressed and who needed reassurance. People had been consulted about the care they wanted to receive and staff supported people to express their individuality. Staff had supported people to pursue a wide range of interests and hobbies and there was a system for resolving complaints.

Regular quality checks had been completed to ensure that people received all of the care they needed. People and their relatives had been consulted about the development of the service. Staff were supported to speak out if they had any concerns because the service was run in an open and relaxed way. People had benefited from staff acting upon good practice guidance because it helped to ensure that they received care which met their individual needs and wishes.