7 February 2022
During a routine inspection
About the service
Healthlinc Apartments is a residential care service providing nursing and personal care for up to seven people who live with a learning disability. Some people may also require support with mental health, sensory or physical needs. There were five people living in the service at the time of the inspection. Healthlinc Apartments is one of three registered services on the same site.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
The provider’s management systems were not robust enough to demonstrate effective oversight of the quality of the service. There was a lack of distinction between two registered services on site. The provider had not fully acknowledged the impact of the high use of agency staff on people and staff. Staff lacked confidence in the provider. Audits had taken place but needed minor improvements regarding action plans.
People were supported by enough staff. However, regular deployment of agency staff meant there was a lack of meaningful interaction between people and those agency staff. Staff understood their responsibilities to keep people safe. People’s medicines were managed safely and reviewed frequently. Measures were in place to reduce the risk of infection to people.
People were supported to take part in activities which were important to them. However, people’s opportunities were impacted when being supported by agency staff who did not know them well. Information was available to people in different methods depending on their needs and preferences. The provider had a policy to effectively manage complaints.
Staff received training relevant to their role. People’s care records reflected their current needs and assessment tools were used to monitor people’s on-going support. People were supported with eating and drinking and staff supported people with different aspects of their daily living. The service and facilities met people’s needs. People had access to on-going healthcare support. People’s mental capacity had been formally assessed and best interests decisions were in place where required.
People were encouraged to express themselves freely using their preferred communication method. Staff treated people with dignity and respect. Staff and people were involved in the running of the service and their views were sought.
Right Culture
There was a lack of visible leadership from the service manager. Agency staff use was high, and this resulted in people not always receiving consistent care from staff who knew them well. People and those important to them were involved in planning their care. Permanent staff placed people’s wishes, needs and rights at the heart of everything they did.
Right Support
Staff supported people to have maximum possible choice and control over their own lives. The service gave people care and support in a safe, clean and well-maintained environment that met their sensory and physical needs. People had a choice about their living environment and were able to personalise their rooms. Staff supported people to make decisions following best practice in decision-making. Staff supported people with their medicines in a way that and achieved the best possible health outcome.
Right Care
Staff promoted equality and diversity in their support for people. Staff protected and respected people’s privacy and dignity. They understood and responded to their individual needs. Staff understood how to protect people from poor care and abuse. The service worked well with other agencies to do so. Staff had training on how to recognise and report abuse and they knew how to apply it. People could communicate with staff and understand information given to them because staff supported them consistently and understood their individual communication needs.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk
Rating at last inspection
The last rating for this service was good (published 21 May 2021).
Why we inspected
We undertook this inspection to assess that the service is applying the principles of Right support, right care, right culture.
We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.
We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvements. Please see the Safe, Responsive and Well-led sections of this full report.
Enforcement
We have identified a breach in relation to the provider’s oversight of the quality of the service at this inspection.
Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.
Follow up
We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.