Archived: 19 Fairview Road

Updated 8 May 2015

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

The inspection took place on 17 March 2015 and was unannounced.

The inspection team consisted of one inspector.

We reviewed the information we held about the service including safeguarding alerts and other notifications. This refers specifically to incidents, events and changes the provider and manager are required to notify us about by law.

We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.

Not everyone who used the service was able to verbally communicate with us. We spoke with four people who used the service, two members of care staff and the manager.

We reviewed three people’s care plans and care records. We looked at the service’s staff support records. We also looked at the service’s arrangements for the management of medicines, complaints and compliments information, and quality monitoring and audit information.

Updated 8 May 2015

The inspection was completed on 17 March 2015 and there were four people living in the service when we inspected.

19 Fairview Road is one of several services owned by Family Mosaic Housing. The service provides accommodation and personal care for up to four people who have a learning disability.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff had a good understanding and knowledge of safeguarding procedures and were clear about the actions they would take to protect people.

There were sufficient numbers of staff available. Appropriate recruitment checks were in place which helped to protect people and ensure staff were suitable to work at the service. Staff told us that they felt well supported in their role and received regular supervision.

Risks to people’s health and wellbeing were appropriately assessed, managed and reviewed. Care plans were sufficiently detailed and provided an accurate description of people’s care and support needs. The management of medicines within the service was safe.

Appropriate assessments had been carried out where people living at the service were not able to make decisions for themselves and to help ensure their rights were protected. People had good healthcare support and accessed healthcare services when required.

People were supported to be able to eat and drink satisfactory amounts to meet their nutritional needs. The mealtime experience for people was positive.

People were treated with kindness and respect by staff. Staff understood people’s needs and provided care and support accordingly. Staff had a good relationship with the people they supported.

An effective system was in place to respond to complaints and concerns. The provider’s quality assurance arrangements were appropriate to ensure that where improvements to the quality of the service was identified, these were addressed.