• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Bailie & Associates Dental Practice - Peckham

184 Peckham High Street, Peckham, London, SE15 5EG (020) 7639 1873

Provided and run by:
Dr. Colin Bailie

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

22/09/2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a desk-based review of Bailie and Associates on 16 September 2020. This review was carried out to assess the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements following a comprehensive inspection carried out on 3 December 2019.

The review was carried out by a CQC inspector who had access to a specialist advisor.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Bailie & Associates on 3 December 2020 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe or well led care and was in breach of Regulation 12 Safe Care and Treatment, and Regulation 17 Good Governance of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Bailie & Associates Dental Practice – Peckham on our website .

As part of this inspection we asked:

  • Is it safe?

  • Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan (requirement notice only). We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 3 December 2019.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 3 December 2019.

Background

Bailie & Associates Dental Practice – Peckham is located in the London Borough of Southwark and provides NHS and private treatment for adults and children.

The dental team includes the principal dentist, three associate dentists, one dental nurse and two trainee dental nurses. The clinical team are supported by a practice manager and a receptionist. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by the principal dentist. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

The practice is open between:

9.00am and 5.30pm - Monday to Thursday

9.00am and 12.30pm on Fridays

Our key findings were :

  • The provider had implemented improvements as identified in the electrical installation certificate , fire risk assessment and the Legionella risk assessment

  • The provider had improved the practice infection control procedures so that they reflected published guidance.

  • There were arrangements to monitor staff performance, training and development needs and information in relation to suitable checks were available.

  • There were effective systems for assessing and monitoring the practice premises and equipment and taking necessary action to ensure that these were well maintained.
  • There were effective systems to ensure that audits were carried out, reviewed and acted upon to monitor and improve the safety and quality of the service.

  • There were effective arrangements for assessing and mitigating risks to patients and staff.

3 December 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this unannounced inspection on 3 December 2019 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Bailie & Associates Dental Practice – Peckham is located in the London Borough of Southwark and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

The dental team includes three associate dentists, one dental nurse and two trainee dental nurses. The clinical team are supported by a practice manager and a receptionist. The practice has three treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by the principal dentist. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with the practice owner, three associate dentists, one dental nurse, the receptionist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open between:

9am and 5.30pm - Mondays to Thursdays

9am and 12.30pm on Fridays.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation. Improvements were needed so that suitable checks were carried out for locum and agency staff who worked at the practice.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance. Improvements were needed so that these procedures were followed and monitored.
  • There were ineffective arrangements for acting on and managing identified risks.
  • There were ineffective arrangements to ensure that premises and equipment were well-maintained.
  • There were ineffective leadership arrangements to support a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Improvements were needed so that staff had appraisals to support learning, development and wellbeing needs.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the practice protocols regarding audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.
  • Review the practice protocols regarding auditing patient dental care records to check that necessary information is recorded.
  • Implement protocols for the use of closed circuit television cameras taking into account the guidelines published by the Information Commissioner's Office.

23 May 2013

During a routine inspection

The two people we spoke said their dentist explained the treatment and the choices available. One of them said, 'he explains what the options are; he always explains very clearly'. Information about fees was displayed in the waiting room and given to people when the treatment plan was agreed.

Care records included a plan that outlined the treatment required, which was signed by the person receiving the treatment. The people we spoke with were very satisfied with their treatment. One of them said, 'the treatment is very efficient and prompt'.

There were arrangements in place in case of emergencies. The staff at the practice had a good understanding of their role in protecting children and vulnerable adults.

The provider was familiar with the latest guidance on infection control. There were effective decontamination processes in place.

Staff felt well supported and there was evidence of regular training.