• Dentist
  • Dentist

John Cuddigan Dental Surgery

163 High Street, Brentwood, Essex, CM14 4SD (01277) 210213

Provided and run by:
Dr. John Cuddigan

All Inspections

23 February 2024

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced comprehensive inspection on 23 February 2024 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions.

We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations.

The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by a specialist dental advisor.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following 5 questions:

  • Is it safe?
  • Is it effective?
  • Is it caring?
  • Is it responsive to people’s needs?
  • Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

  • The dental clinic appeared clean and well-maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with medical emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were not always available. The practice took immediate action to replace missing items.
  • The practice had some systems to manage risks for patients, staff, equipment and the premises. Lone worker risk assessments were not undertaken.
  • Safeguarding processes were in place and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The practice had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • Clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect. Staff took care to protect patients’ privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system worked efficiently to respond to patients’ needs.
  • The frequency of appointments was agreed between the dentist and the patient, giving due regard to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines.
  • There was effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement. Auditing of radiographs and patient dental care records were not completed.
  • Staff felt involved, supported and worked as a team.
  • Staff and patients were asked for feedback about the services provided.
  • Complaints were dealt with positively and efficiently.
  • The practice had information governance arrangements.

Background

John Cuddigan Dental Surgery in in Brentwood, Essex and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is step free access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for disabled people, are available at the practice. The practice has made reasonable adjustments to support patients with access requirements.

The dental team includes 3 dentists, 4 dental nurses including 2 trainee dental nurses, 2 dental hygienists and 2 receptionists. The practice has 2 treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with 2 dentists, 2 dental nurses, 1 dental hygienist, and 1 receptionist. We looked at practice policies, procedures and other records to assess how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday and Wednesday from 9am to 6pm.

Tuesday from 9am to 8pm.

Thursday from 8am to 7pm.

Friday from 8am to 6pm.

Saturday from 9am to 1pm.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Improve the practice protocols regarding auditing radiographs and patient dental care records to check that necessary information is recorded. In addition, implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the College of General Dentistry.
  • Improve the practice's systems for assessing, monitoring and mitigating the various risks arising from the undertaking of the regulated activities. In particular, lone worker risk assessments.

During a check to make sure that the improvements required had been made

At our review of compliance undertaken in March 2013 we found that the provider did not have effective systems in place to ensure that people were always protected from the risk of infection or the risks of unsafe recruitment processes.

In July 2013, the provider was able to demonstrate that they had taken steps to address the identified shortfalls.

22 February 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with three people who used the service. They told us they were given good information about any planned treatment and costs and were asked for their consent before it was carried out.

People told us they had used the service for a number of years and were satisfied with the care and treatment they received from the staff working there.

One person using the service said of the staff, 'The staff are very good, and they are friendly. There are quite competent. There have been some new people, recently qualified so you know their training is up to date and that they are competent, it is reassuring.'

We found that management systems, both for staff recruitment and reducing the risk of infection, were not effective to ensure the safety and well being of people using the service.

There was an effective complaints system available. Comments and complaints people made were responded to appropriately.