• Dentist
  • Dentist

Bramley Dental Practice - Main Street

93 Main Street, Bramley, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S66 2SE (01709) 700780

Provided and run by:
Dr Anoop Soni

All Inspections

10 February 2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of Bramley Dental Practice – Main Street on the 10 February 2020. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Bramley Dental Practice – Main Street on 4 November 2019 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe and well led care and was in breach of regulation 12 and 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Bramley Dental Practice – Main Street on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked: Remove as appropriate:

• Is it safe?

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 4 November 2019.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 4 November 2019.

Background

Bramley Dental Practice - Main Street is located in Bramley, Rotherham and provides NHS and private treatments to adults and children. The practice is a foundation dentist training practice.

Access for wheelchair users and pushchairs is via a portable ramp into the reception area. Car parking spaces are available near the practice.

The dental team includes a principal dentist, a foundation training dentist and seven associate dentists, 14 dental nurses (five of whom are trainees), one dental hygienist, two dental hygiene therapist and two receptionists and two practice managers. The practice has five treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a partnership as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the CQC as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Bramley Dental Practice – Main Street is the principal dentist.

During the inspection we spoke with principal dentist and the practice managers. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday and Tuesday 9am - 6pm, Wednesday to Thursday 9am - 5pm. Friday 9am - 1pm

Our key findings were:

  • Legionella management systems reflected current guidance and risk assessment.
  • Safer sharps systems reflected current regulations.
  • Risk mitigation was in place for staff without Hepatitis B vaccination results.
  • An effective system was in place to respond to patient safety alerts.
  • Clinical waste management complied with published guidance.
  • Recommendations made by the Radiation Protection Advisor had been acted upon.
  • Systems to ensure staff employed continued to meet the professional standards was effective.
  • Recruitment processes reflected current legislation.
  • The process to audit implant placement was in progress.

4 November 2019

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 4 November 2019 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Bramley Dental Practice - Main Street is located in Bramley, Rotherham and provides NHS and private treatments to adults and children. The practice is a foundation dentist training practice.

Access for wheelchair users and pushchairs is via a portable ramp into the reception area. Car parking spaces are available near the practice.

The dental team includes a principal dentist, a foundation training dentist and seven associate dentists, fourteen dental nurses (five of whom are trainees), one dental hygienist, two dental hygiene therapist and two receptionists and two practice managers. The practice has five treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a partnership as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the CQC as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

At the time of inspection there was no registered manager in post as required as a condition of registration. A registered manager is legally responsible for the delivery of services for which the practice is registered. We saw evidence on the day of inspection which confirmed that registration was in progress.

On the day of inspection, we collected 35 CQC comment cards filled in by patients. All comments reflected favourably on the service provided.

During the inspection we spoke with dentists, three dental nurses, one dental hygiene therapist, one receptionist and the practice managers. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday and Tuesday 9am - 6pm, Wednesday to Thursday 9am - 5pm. Friday 9am - 1pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Improvements could be made to ensure clinical waste was managed in line with guidance.
  • Legionella management systems were not carried out in line with guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • Systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff could be improved.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • There was limited evidence to confirm that recruitment procedures reflected current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • The completion of patient care records could be improved.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • There was limited evidence to confirm that staff employed continued to meet the professional standards.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • Leadership and oversight could be improved to ensure guidance, regulations and standards are being met.
  • Quality assurance systems could be improved to follow guidance and for learning and improvement.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care
  • Ensure sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, competent, skilled and experienced persons are deployed to meet the fundamental standards of care and treatment
  • Ensure recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to ensure only fit and proper persons are employed

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to ensure the clinicians take into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice when completing dental care records.

21 February 2017

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 21 February 2017 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Bramley Dental Practice is located in Bramley, Rotherham and provides NHS and private treatments to adults and children, which includes dental implants and cosmetic dentistry. The practice is a foundation dentist training practice.

Access for wheelchair users and pushchairs is via a portable ramp into the reception area. Car parking spaces are available near the practice.

The dental team is comprised of eight dentists (one is a foundation training dentist), eight dental nurses (five are trainee dental nurses), one dental hygienist, one dental hygiene therapist, two practice managers and three receptionists. There are five treatment rooms and an unused X-ray room. The practice has been extended over the years and has a separate annex building approximately 25yds away, in which are two further treatment rooms and the instrument decontamination room.

On the day of inspection we received 25 CQC comment cards providing positive feedback and we spoke with four patients.

The practice is open: Monday and Tuesday 9:15am - 6:00pm, Wednesday to Thursday 9:15am -5:00pm. Friday 9:00am – 1:00pm

There is no current member of staff registered as a manager at this practice. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run. We saw evidence which confirmed that registration was in progress.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean but was cluttered due to space limitations.
  • Infection control procedures were effective but the process for the transportation of contaminated instruments required improvement.
  • Staff had been trained to handle emergencies and appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were readily available in accordance with current guidelines.
  • The practice had systems in place to manage risk but some processes required improvement.
  • Staff understood and received safeguarding training and knew how to recognise signs of abuse and how to report it.
  • Oral health advice and treatment were provided in-line with the ‘Delivering Better Oral Health’ toolkit (DBOH).
  • There were sufficient numbers of suitably qualified staff to meet the needs of patients.
  • Safe recruitment of staff was in place.
  • Emergency equipment was in place and staff were trained to respond to medical emergencies.
  • Treatment was well planned and provided in line with current guidelines.
  • Patients were treated with dignity and respect and confidentiality was maintained.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • The service was aware of the needs of the local population and took these into account in how the practice was run.
  • The practice was well-led, staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The governance systems required improvement.
  • The practice sought feedback from staff and patients about the services they provided but could be improved.
  • Complaints were responded to in an efficient and responsive manor.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review the practice’s Reporting of Injuries, Disease and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 (RIDDOR) policy and embed it within the practice to bring it in line with current regulations.
  • Review the security and storage of dental care records to comply with the Data Protection Act.
  • Review the current fire assessment and complete the actions identified to mitigate the escape risk and embed fire safety within the practice.
  • Review the security of prescription pads and ensure there are systems in place to monitor and track their use.
  • Review the process for assessing X-ray quality to ensure they are in line with the National Radiological Protection Board and IR(ME)R 2000 regulations.
  • Review the practice’s process for the tracking of external referrals.
  • Review staff knowledge of the Mental Capacity Act and Gillick competency and provide refresher training.

30 April 2013

During a routine inspection

People's needs were assessed and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual treatment plan. The people we spoke with commented positively about the care and treatment they had received. They said it was easy to make appointments and waiting times at the practice were minimal. One person told us 'My dentist gives me all the options available and talks me through the process with me.'

There were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection. We saw people were protected from the risk of infection because appropriate guidance had been followed. People we spoke with told us the practice was clean and staff always wore protective clothing when treating them.

There were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people's needs. During our inspection we saw staff were able to meet people's needs in a timely way.

Staff received appropriate professional development. We saw staff had accessed various training so they could meet people's needs and maintain their qualifications. People told us staff seemed well trained and competent in their jobs.

The practice had an effective well organised system to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that people received.