• Dentist
  • Dentist

Mydentist - Beaconsfield Road - Weston Super Mare

12 Beaconsfield Road, Weston Super Mare, Somerset, BS23 1YE (01934) 626677

Provided and run by:
IDH Limited

All Inspections

26 June 2017

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 26 June 2017 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We told the NHS England area team and Healthwatch that we were inspecting the practice. They did not provide any information.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Mydentist – Beaconsfield Road is in Weston-Super-Mare and provides NHS and private treatment to patients of all ages.

There is level access into the surgery for people who use wheelchairs and pushchairs. When in the surgery there are four steps up to the ground floor surgery and the practice has a removable ramp to facilitate wheelchair access over these steps. Car parking spaces are available in front of the practice. There are no marked parking spaces for patients with disabled badges.

The dental team includes five dentists, one dental nurse and five trainee dental nurses, one dental hygienist, one treatment co-ordinator, a practice manager and two receptionists. The practice has six treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a company and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the Care Quality Commission as the registered manager.

Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. At the time of the inspection the practice did not have a registered manager in post although the practice manger was in the process of applying.

On the day of inspection we collected 11 CQC comment cards filled in by patients and spoke with four other patients. This information gave us a positive view of the practice.

During the inspection we spoke with five dentists, one dental nurse and three trainee dental nurses, two receptionists and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday – Friday 08.30am to 5.00pm. Closed at weekends.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice was clean and well maintained.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The practice had systems to help them manage risk.
  • The practice had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • The practice had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • The practice had effective leadership. Staff felt involved, supported and worked well as a team.
  • The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The practice dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.

30 April 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This inspection was to follow up on a compliance action issued at the last inspection on 20 November 2013. The provider sent us an action plan and told us they would be compliant by 28 February 2014.

We found the practice had made improvements to meet the compliance action set. This meant the manager had appropriate systems in place that ensured risks to patient's health and welfare were managed effectively. There was a system in place that ensured there was learning from compliments and complaints raised about the service.

We did not speak with patients during our inspection on this occasion.

20 November 2013

During a routine inspection

The practice had four dentists, an implantologist and six dental nurses who provided dental treatment. We spoke with seven people to gain their views and experience of the service and treatment received from their dentist. Some people were complementary about the service received. They commented 'I have a dislike of dentists but feel I can come back here, it was really good seeing him'. Another person said 'It was absolutely brilliant. They put you at ease and absolutely explain everything'.

One person commented 'I have been coming to this practice for over 20 years, I used to see the same dentist and hygienist when it was private (owned by another company) now there is a constant flow of dentists and hygienist. I think it is disgraceful. They need to improve on retaining their staff. I have considered leaving because of it'.

People told us they could express their views and make informed decisions about their treatment. We read four individual dental treatment records. Three out of four records showed the reasons why treatment was recommended, people's agreement of treatment choices and any oral health advice given.

There were good procedures in place to clean and sterilise dental equipment to minimise the risk of people acquiring an infection. Staff had received regular training to prevent the risk of infection. Staff spoken with were aware of their responsibilities in reducing the risk of infection within the practice.

At the time of our inspection the provider did not have a registered manager in post. The service had not had a registered manager in post since it was registered in April 2011. The provider informed us that they had a manager in post who would apply for registration in the near future. The practice manager in post had been in place since September 2013.

We found systems to manage the service were not always effectively monitored by the provider in order to reduce risks to people's health and safety. There was no system in place for staff to reflect on and learn from comments and complaints made by people who used the service.