Updated 14 December 2019
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team
The inspection was carried out by one inspector.
Service and service type
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because it is a small service and we needed to be sure that the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection.
Inspection activity started on 26 November 2019 and ended on 2 December 2019. We visited the office location on 26 and 27 November 2019. We made telephone calls to people and reviewed information received from the service on the 2 December 2019.
What we did before the inspection
The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We gave the registered manger opportunities throughout the inspection to share with us what they did well. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report.
We reviewed information we held about the service since the last inspection and what people had told us. We contacted local authority safeguarding teams. We used all of this information to plan our inspection
During the inspection
We contacted 18 people and their relatives via email to seek feedback and received 10 replies. We contacted 12 staff and we received feedback from seven. We spoke with the registered manager and the deputy manager.
We reviewed a range of records. This included three people’s care records in full and a further two to check compliance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005. We looked at four staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision. A variety of records relating to the management of the service, including policies and procedures were reviewed.
After the inspection
We made telephone calls to eight people and received feedback from four people about their experience. We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We requested some additional information about quality governance, which the provider promptly supplied.