Background to this inspection
Updated
26 October 2019
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team
The inspection was undertaken by two inspectors.
Service and service type
Oaklea house is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
This inspection was unannounced.
What we did before inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from the local authority. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
We spoke with four people who used the service and one relative about their experience of the care provided. We spoke with six members of staff including the registered manager, deputy manager, regional quality manager and care workers.
We reviewed a range of records. This included four people’s care records and multiple medication records. We looked at two staff files in relation to recruitment, and staff supervision. We also reviewed a variety of records relating to the management of the service, including policies and procedures.
After the inspection
We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We looked at training data and quality assurance records. We spoke with two professionals who have worked with the service and one relative.
Updated
26 October 2019
About the service
Oaklea House is a residential care home providing personal care to ten people at the time of our inspection. The service is registered to support up to 12 people, in one adapted building.
The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.
The service was a large home, bigger than most domestic style properties. It was registered for the support of up to 12 people. Ten people were using the service. This is larger than current best practice guidance. However, the size of the service having a negative impact on people was mitigated by the building design fitting into the residential area and the other large domestic homes of a similar size and staff were discouraged from wearing anything that suggested they were care staff when coming and going with people.
The Secretary of State has asked the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to conduct a thematic review and to make recommendations about the use of restrictive interventions in settings that provide care for people with or who might have mental health problems, learning disabilities and/or autism. Thematic reviews look in-depth at specific issues concerning quality of care across the health and social care sectors. They expand our understanding of both good and poor practice and of the potential drivers of improvement.
As part of thematic review, we carried out a survey with the registered manager at this inspection. This considered whether the service used any restrictive intervention practices (restraint, seclusion and segregation) when supporting people.
The service used positive behaviour support principles to support people in the least restrictive way. No restrictive intervention practices were used.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
People’s end of life wishes were not recorded, however the registered manager stated they were aware of people’s wishes and they would record these in people’s care plans. People received personalised care responsive to their needs and the service was meeting people’s communication needs. People were supported to take part in activities that were of interest to them and people told us they felt able to complain should they need to.
Systems were in place to ensure people were protected from the risk of potential abuse. Staff were safely recruited and there were enough staff to meet people’s needs. People could be assured they received their medication safely and staff had access to personal protective equipment such as gloves and aprons. Risks were assessed and planned for and lessons were learned when things had gone wrong.
People had their needs and choices assessed and were supported to maintain their nutritional needs. The service had been adapted to meet the needs of the people who lived there, and people were able to personalise their bedrooms as they wished. Staff received training in order for them to support people effectively and people had access to healthcare.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
People were supported by kind, caring staff who knew them well and they felt able to express their views. People’s dignity was respected, and their independence was promoted by staff.
The service promoted a positive, person-centred culture and engaged people using the service. Managers and staff were clear about their roles and regulatory requirements were met. The provider was aware of their duty of candour and worked in partnership with others.
The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence.
The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk
Rating at last inspection
The last rating for this service was good (29 March 2017).
Why we inspected
This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.
Follow up
We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.