We carried out a review of the data available to us about Mentaur Community Support Limited on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Mentaur Community Support Limited, you can give feedback on this service.
Mentaur Community Support Limited provides care and support predominantly to people with learning disabilities. The service supports some people lived in a supported living setting, and some people living in their own homes, so that they can live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked only at people’s personal care and support.
Not everyone using Mentaur Community Support Limited receives the regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of this inspection the service was only supporting one person living in a supported living service with their personal care needs.
A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People told us they felt safe, and staff had an understanding of abuse and the safeguarding procedures that should be followed to report abuse. All the staff we spoke with were confident that any concerns they raised would be followed up appropriately by their manager. Staffing levels were flexible to meet the needs of people using the service and adequate recruitment procedures were in place. People had risk assessments in place which outlined their known risks and safe procedures were in place to administer people’s medicines.
People’s needs were fully considered before they began to use the service to make sure their needs could be met. People's consent was gained before their care was provided. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
People were treated with dignity and respect and staff were able to spend time getting on know people and their preferences. People and their relatives were made to feel welcome at the service, and were involved in making choices about their care.
People had care plans in place which reflected their needs and these were regularly updated. Staff made great efforts to help people achieve their goals or participate in activities that they could enjoy. Complaint procedures were in place for people to make a complaint, should the need arise.
The service was well led and people and staff had confidence in the leadership. The registered manager had effective quality assurance systems in place which helped to improve the service and people and staff were encouraged to provide feedback about any improvements that could be made. The culture at the service was open and transparent and people were involved in their care decisions and empowered to be as independent as possible.