We undertook this announced site inspection of Human Support Group – West Leeds on 2, 11 and 17 May 2018. This inspection was prompted by information shared with CQC about the potential concerns around the management of people's care needs. We reviewed those risks.This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats. It provides a service to older adults. Not everyone using Human Support Group West Leeds receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.
Human Support Group West Leeds is registered with the Care Quality Commission to provide personal care to people in their own homes.
At the time of our inspection, 142 people were supported with their personal care needs by the service. There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
At our last inspection of the service on 13, 15 and 23 June 2017 we found staff were not always supported in their roles and there were not effective systems in place to monitor support and supervision with staff members. At this inspection we found the provider had undertaken improvements to the quality of care people received. However, we found concerns in other areas.
There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
Staff had not always supported people safely with their medicines if required. Records of medicines administration had not always been documented and medicines care records did not always direct staff on how people liked to take their medicines.
Mostly people told us they felt safe. Staff understood how to recognise and report signs of abuse or mistreatment. Staff had received training on how to recognise the various forms of abuse, which was regularly updated and refreshed. The provider carried out risk assessments to identify any risks to people using the service and to the staff supporting them. There was a lone working policy, which staff knew about. Safe recruitment processes were completed.
The provider had recognised the need to recruit sufficient numbers of staff to keep people safe. The staff team had recently had lots of changes both with caring staff, office staff and management. This had affected some people with their continuity of care. The rota recorded details of people's visit times and which staff would provide the visit. The registered manager or senior staff were on call outside of office hours and had access to the rota, telephone numbers of people using the service and staff with them.
Staff followed good infection control practice. Staff knew the reporting process for any accidents or incidents. Records showed that the provider had taken appropriate action where necessary, and made changes to reduce the risk of a re-occurrence of an incident. The service had suitable processes to assess people's needs and choices, the care lead went out to assess people prior to a package of care commencing to check the service could meet the person's needs.
Staff had appropriate skills, knowledge, and experience to deliver effective care and support. All new staff completed the Care Certificate. The Care Certificate is an identified set of national standards that health and social care workers should follow when they are new to working in the care sector. Staff completed food hygiene training, they knew about good practice when it came to nutrition and hydration.
Staff asked people for their consent before delivering care or support and they respected people's choice to refuse care. Care records showed that people signed a contract of care where they gave their consent to the care and support provided. All the people we spoke with said they had been included from the beginning in planning their care.
The provider was responsive to people's needs. Staff supported people, and involved them, (as far as they were able), to draw up and agree their own support plan. All the relatives we spoke with said they had good communication with most staff at every level and were involved in their relative's care. People are supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
The provider sought people's feedback and acted to address issues raised. There was a system in place to manage and investigate any complaints. People had information about how to make a complaint in their care records and in their home. The provider recorded incidents and accidents for patterns of behaviour. They used this information to consider any changes in a person's support needs and how staff could meet those needs.
There was a management structure in the service, which provided clear lines of responsibility and accountability. Staff were valued by the provider and their contributions were appreciated and celebrated.
There were quality assurance arrangements at the service to raise standards and drive improvements. The service's approach to quality assurance included completion of an annual survey. The provider had ensured they complied with all relevant legal requirements, including registration and safety obligations, and the submission of notifications.
Further information is in the detailed findings below