7 October 2019
During a routine inspection
Applewood Support Limited is registered to provide personal care to people who live in their own homes. At the time of the inspection 60 people were supported by the agency. This included older people, some of whom were living with dementia and, or, specific health conditions.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
Since our last inspection, improvements had been made to personalise care records, so staff had information about what people liked to talk about, their hobbies and interests. People and their relatives gave us positive feedback about staff being kind and caring toward them. Staff promoted people’s independence and maintained people’s privacy and dignity.
Overall, staff knew people well and how to reduce risks of harm or injury. However, risk management plans had not always been written when risks had been identified. This meant new staff or staff covering care visits did not always have important information to refer to if needed and regular staff could not refresh their knowledge of people's needs.
Staff had received training on how to protect people from the risks of abuse and understood the importance of reporting any concerns.
Staff understood how to reduce the risks of spreading infection. People had their prescribed medicines available to them and were supported with these from trained care staff.
There were sufficient staff and people received their care visits at the agreed times. The provider had a call monitoring system that created an alert if care staff were running late. When alerts were received these were acted on to ensure people received their care visit. The provider had a safe recruitment system to ensure staff’s suitability to work at the home.
People’s needs were assessed before their care visits commenced. People were supported with their food and drink where this was part of their agreed care. Staff worked within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and understood the importance of gaining consent from people.
There were systems were in place for people and their relatives to give their feedback on the service. People felt well cared for and they, and their relatives had no complaints.
There were some quality assurance systems in place to check the safety and quality of the services. However, improvement was required to the managerial oversight through audits to ensure these were robust and identified any issues where improvements were needed.
The provider and registered manager needed to refresh their knowledge about when they were required to send statutory notifications to CQC and ensure they met their legal responsibilities.
Rating at the last inspection
The last rating for this service was Good (published 26 May 2017).
Why we inspected
This was a planned inspection based on the rating of the last inspection.
Follow up
We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our inspection programme. If any concerning information is received, we may inspect sooner.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk