18 December 2017
During a routine inspection
The provider was the registered manager, and was present during the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People received a safe service from the Woodleigh Healthcare Surrey. There were sufficient numbers of staff who were appropriately trained to meet the needs of the people who used the service. Staff understood their duty should they suspect abuse was taking place, including the agencies that needed to be notified, such as the local authority safeguarding board or the police.
Staff recruitment procedures were safe. The provider had undertaken appropriate safety checks to ensure that only suitable staff were employed to support people in their own home. Staff said they felt supported to undertake their roles.
Staff managed the medicines in a safe way and were trained in the safe administration of medicines.
Where people did not have the capacity to understand or consent to a decision the provider had followed the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (2005). Staff understood that they had to gain people’s consent before they provided care, and that they could not make decisions for people.
People were supported to have enough to eat and drink. They received support from staff where a need had been identified.
People were supported to maintain good health. Staff understood that if people’s health deteriorated they would respond quickly. They would make sure they contacted the appropriate professionals to ensure people received effective treatment. Emergency plans were in place to deal with situations that may stop the service running, such as adverse weather.
Staff had a positive and caring attitude about their jobs. People told us that they were happy with the care and support they received. People told us that the staff were kind and caring and treated them with dignity and respect. The staff knew the people they cared for as individuals, and had a good rapport with relatives. All the staff we spoke with were happy in their work and proud of the job they do.
People received the care and support as detailed in their care plans. Care plans were based around the individual preferences of people as well as their medical, psychological and emotional needs. They gave a good level of detail for staff to reference if they needed to know what support was required.
People knew how to make a complaint. Staff knew how to respond to a complaint and welcomed them as an opportunity to improve the service.
The provider had effective systems in place to monitor the quality of care and support that people received. The provider had ensured that accurate records relating to the care and treatment of people and the overall management of the service were maintained.
The provider regularly visited people in their homes, or telephoned them to give people and staff an opportunity to talk, and to ensure a good standard of care was being provided to people.
Records for checks on health and safety, and medicines audits were all up to date. Accident and incident records were kept, and were analysed and used to improve the care provided to people.