4 January 2019
During a routine inspection
We last inspected EAM Lodge on 18 and 19 October 2017. At that time, we rated the service requires improvement overall and identified breaches of regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and staff training. We also made two recommendations in relation to assessing people’s needs in relation to the use of assistive technologies, and assessing the safety of the premises and equipment.
At this inspection we found the provider had taken action and had made improvements in relation to all the previous breaches and recommendations. The provider was found to be meeting the requirements of all regulations.
EAM Lodge is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.
EAM Lodge accommodates up to five people in one adapted building. The service provides care, including nursing care to young adults who have a learning disability and/or complex heath care needs. The home provides support to people staying at the home for short breaks (respite), as well people who live at the home on a longer-term basis. At the time of our inspection there were three people living at the home on a permanent basis, and two rooms were available to people staying for short breaks. There was one person staying at the service for a short break on the first day of our inspection.
The care service has been developed and designed in line with the values that underpin the Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These values include choice, promotion of independence and inclusion. People with learning disabilities and autism using the service can live as ordinary a life as any citizen.
There was a registered manager who was registered to manage the service in September 2016. The registered manager intended to step down from this position in the future, but told us they would continue in the role until the provider could find a suitable replacement. The day to day management of the home had also been supported by the registered manager working at the neighbouring service, EAM House.
A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
There were sufficient staff on duty to enable staff to meet people’s needs. We saw staffing levels were varied dependent on the needs of people using the service. The registered manager also considered the skill-mix of the staff team when deploying staff.
We saw any accidents and incidents were thoroughly investigated, and steps were taken to help prevent a repeat incident and to make the service safer. There was an open and honest culture, and the provider encouraged staff to reflect on how they could have done things differently when they went wrong. Lessons were learned from any incidents and this resulted in improvements being made within the service.
The registered manager and staff team demonstrated a commitment and enthusiasm for delivering quality, person-centred support. The service did not use agency staff, which helped the service provide consistent care from staff that knew people well.
Staff were kind, caring and respectful in their approach. Staff had developed close relationships with people using the service. They had a good understanding of people’s needs and preferences. We observed people smiling and laughing with staff and they appeared relaxed and comfortable when receiving support.
Staff received the training and support they needed to meet people’s needs effectively. The provider checked staff were competent to provide the care and support people needed.
Staff provided opportunities for people to engage in a range of activities that met their needs and preferences. People were supported to access the local community and community groups. Some people had been supported to attend events of interest to them such as music concerts and the rugby.
The service worked alongside a range of health and social care professionals in order to meet people’s needs. We saw staff had developed detailed care plans that were updated as people’s needs changed. Care plans reflected people’s needs and preferences in relation to how their care was provided.
Relatives told us staff communicated well with them. They told us they would feel confident to raise a complaint if they had any concerns.
There were systems in place to help the registered manager and provider monitor the quality and safety of the service.
Staff understood the principles of the mental capacity act, and we saw evidence of good practice in relation to completion of capacity assessments and best-interest decisions. However, as at our last inspection, some consent forms had been signed by others when there was no evidence that they had authority to provide consent on that person’s behalf.
The provider sought and acted on the views of people using the service or their representatives. They considered and acted on feedback received from relevant persons such as the CQC and the coroner.
The coroner had issued a prevention of future deaths report in April 2018 following the inquest of a child who had died when staying at the neighbouring service, EAM House in July 2016. This was relevant to this inspection because of shared processes, staff and management teams between the two services. However, we found the provider had acted on all the concerns raised in the coroner’s report to make improvements at both services. We have reported in more detail on this issue in our report for EAM House published in October 2018.