We carried out a review of the data available to us about Stokewood on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.
This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.
If you have concerns about Stokewood, you can give feedback on this service.
A registered manager was in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
Medicines were managed safely and in accordance with current regulations and guidance. There were systems in place to ensure that medicines had been stored, administered, audited and reviewed appropriately.
People were happy and relaxed with staff. They said they felt safe and there were sufficient staff to support them. When staff were recruited, their employment history was checked and references obtained.
Checks were also undertaken to ensure new staff were safe to work within the care sector.
Risks associated with the environment and equipment had been identified and managed.
Emergency procedures were in place in the event of fire and people knew what to do, as did the staff.
Staff were knowledgeable and trained in safeguarding adults and what action they should take if they suspected abuse was taking place. Staff had a good understanding of equality, diversity and human rights.
People were being supported to make decisions in their best interests. The registered manager and staff had received training in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS).
Accidents and incidents were recorded appropriately and steps taken to minimise the risk of similar events happening in the future.
Staff had received essential training and there were opportunities for additional training specific to the needs of the service, including the care of people with dementia and palliative care (end of life).
Staff had received both supervision meetings with their manager and formal personal development plans such as annual appraisals were in place.
People were encouraged and supported to eat and drink well. There was a varied daily choice of meals and people were able to give feedback and have choice in what they ate and drank. Health care was accessible for people and appointments were made for regular check-ups as needed.
People felt well looked after and supported. We observed friendly relationships had developed between people and staff. Care plans described people's preferences and needs in relevant areas, including communication, and they were encouraged to be as independent as possible.
People's end of life care was discussed and planned and their wishes had been respected.
People chose how to spend their day and they took part in activities.
People were encouraged to express their views and had completed surveys. They also said they felt listened to and any concerns or issues they raised were addressed.
People's individual needs were met by the adaptation of the premises.
Staff were asked for their opinions on the service and whether they were happy in their work. They felt supported within their roles, describing an 'open door' management approach, where managers were always available to discuss suggestions and address problems or concerns.
The provider undertook quality assurance reviews to measure and monitor the standard of the service and drive improvement.