Updated 31 August 2019
The inspection: We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team: This inspection was carried out by one adult social care inspector.
Service and service type: IAS 83 Union St provides care and support to people living in their own homes as supported tenancies.
The service had a manager who was in the process of registering with the Care Quality Commission. Once registered this means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection: We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection visit because we needed to be sure that staff would be in the office to support the inspection.
We visited the office location on 27 June 2019 to meet with the manager and the head of operations and to review records connected with the management of the service. On 9 July 2019 we visited three supported living households and spoke with a senior lead, two team leaders and three support workers. We returned to the office on 16 July 2019 to give the service feedback on our findings.
What we did: We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. This included details about incidents the provider must notify us about, such as abuse, and we sought feedback from the local authority. We had not requested a provider information return (PIR). The PIR gives some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. However, the service provided us with this information during our visit.
During the inspection we met and observed for short periods 10 people who were limited in their ability to speak with us and staff supporting them.
We reviewed the care plans and risk assessments for two people, three staff recruitment files, the training matrix for staff and a range of records relating to the management of the service.