The practice had information available to patients that included a website and information leaflets. One person told us that they were given adequate information about their treatment, which enabled them to make an informed decision.Medical consultations took place in private and a chaperone was available if a patient requested one. Access to translation services was available if required and although the consultation room was not accessible to people using wheelchairs, there were arrangements to see such patients at an alternative practice.
All patients were assessed and a medical history taken. Medical examinations were carried out by the doctor and treatment options were discussed with the patient.
We were told that all patients had treatment plans. One patient told us that the treatment by the practice "changed their life" and that they "could not fault" the practice.
Staff knew how to recognise the signs of abuse and how to contact at the local authority should they have concerns for a patient's welfare.
Staff received appropriate professional development and attended mandatory training. There were arrangements for supervision of staff and they were appraised on their performance annually.
Staff carried out clinical audits on medical records and treatment registers. There was a preventative maintenance plan in place and electrical and fire equipment testing had been carried out.