Background to this inspection
Updated
5 September 2018
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
This inspection took place on 10 and 12 July 2018 and was announced. The inspection team consisted of an inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.
Before the inspection we reviewed the information we held about the service and the service provider. We looked at the notifications we had received for this service. Notifications are information about important events the service is required to send us by law. We reviewed previous inspection. We also obtained feedback from commissioners of the service.
We spoke with 10 people and two relatives. We looked at three people’s care records and medicine administration records (MAR). The methods we used to gather information included pathway tracking, which is capturing the experiences of a sample of people by following a person’s route through the home and getting their views on their care. During the inspection we spent time with people. We visited three people in their homes and observed the way staff interacted with people. We spoke with the registered manager, two care coordinators and four care staff. We reviewed a range of records relating to the management of the service. These included six staff files, quality assurance audits, minutes of meetings with people and staff, incident reports, complaints and compliments. In addition, we reviewed feedback from people who had used the service and their relatives.
Updated
5 September 2018
This inspection took place on 10 and 12 July 2018 and was announced.
This service provides care and support to people living in a ‘supported living’ setting, so that they can live in their own home as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.
At the time of the inspection, the service supported 18 people.
There was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run
People who were supported by the service felt safe. Staff had a clear understanding on how to safeguard people and protect their health and well-being. People received their medicines as prescribed. There were systems in place to manage safe administration and storage of medicines.
The service had robust recruitment procedures and conducted background checks to ensure staff were suitable for their roles.
People had a range of individualised risk assessments in place to keep them safe and to help them maintain their independence. Where risks to people had been identified, risk assessments were in place and action had been taken to manage the risks. Staff were aware of people’s needs and followed guidance to keep them safe.
Staff received adequate training and support to carry out their roles effectively. People felt supported by competent staff that benefitted from regular supervision (one to one meetings with their line manager) and team meetings to help them meet the needs of the people they cared for.
The registered manager and staff had a good understanding of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and applied its principles in their work. Where people were thought to lack capacity to make certain decisions, assessments had been completed in line with the principles of MCA. Staff were knowledgeable about the rights of people to make their own choices. This was reflected in the way the care plans were written and the way in which staff supported and encouraged people to make decisions when delivering care and support.
People’s nutritional needs were met. People were given choices and were supported to have their meals when they needed them. Staff treated people with kindness, compassion and respect and promoted people’s independence and right to privacy. People received care that was personalised to meet their needs.
People were supported to maintain their health and were referred for specialist advice as required. There were good systems in place to allow safe transitioning between services.
Staff knew the people they cared for and what was important to them. Staff appreciated people’s life histories and understood how these could influence the way people wanted to be cared for. Staff supported and encouraged people to engage with a variety of social activities of their choice in the community. People were supported to work.
The service looked for ways to continually improve the quality of the service. Feedback was sought from people and their relatives and used to improve the care. People knew how to make a complaint and complaints were managed in accordance with the provider’s complaints policy.
Leadership within the service was open, transparent and promoted strong organisational values. This resulted in a caring culture that put people using the service at its centre. People, their relatives and staff were complimentary about the management team and how the service was run.
The registered manager informed us of all notifiable incidents. Staff spoke positively about the management support and leadership they received from the management team.