28 July 2022
During a routine inspection
We carried out an announced inspection at Lockfield Surgery on 28 July 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as Good.
We rated each key question as follows:
Safe - Requires improvement
Effective - Good
Caring - Good
Responsive - Good
Well-led - Good
The service was last inspected on 29 November 2021 and rated Inadequate overall. Following the inspection, we took enforcement action against the provider and issued warning notices for breaches of Regulation 12, Safe care and treatment and Regulation 17, Good governance of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. The service was placed in special measures.
An announced focused inspection was carried out on 29 March 2022 and included a site visit to confirm that the provider had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the warning notices issued. At this inspection in March 2022 we found the practice had taken the action needed to comply with the legal requirements of the warning notice we issued.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Lockfield Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this inspection
This was a comprehensive inspection which included a site visit to review all of the key questions, assess if the practice could be removed from special measures and update the provider’s rating.
How we carried out the inspection
Throughout the pandemic Care Quality Commission (CQC) has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.
This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.
This included :
- Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing
- Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
- Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
- Requesting evidence from the provider
- A short site visit
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We have rated this practice as Good overall
We found that:
- Systems and processes were embedded to ensure risks were assessed and managed.
- The practice had comprehensive systems in place for the appropriate and safe use of medicines, this included regular monitoring arrangements for patients on high risk medicines. Plans were in place to assess all patients due a medicine review prioritising high risk patients, however since November 2021 less than half of those who required a review at that time had received one.
- There was a structured and coordinated approach to the management of patients care and treatment including those with long term conditions. The practice was proactive in following up and responding to patients who did not attend.
- The practice continued to achieve below the minimum requirements for cancer screening. The uptake of childhood immunisations, although improved. was below the World Health Organisations target . However, we found the practice was taking appropriate action to improve uptake.
- Staff were provided opportunities for training and development with access to appraisals and clinical supervision. Staff described a positive culture with practice wide learning encouraged and supported.
- The results of the recent national GP survey showed the practice was mostly above the local and national average in questions relating to caring and accessing the service. The practice had consistently performed well in these areas.
- There was compassionate, inclusive and effective leadership at all levels. Leaders had developed capacity and skills with a commitment to delivering high quality, sustainable care.
- There was clear and effective accountability and oversight to support good governance.
Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:
- Continue to take action to review all patients due a medicine review ensuring these are completed in a timely manner.
- Continue to monitor and take action to improve the uptake of cancer screening and childhood immunisation.
I am taking this service out of special measures. This recognises the significant improvements made to the quality of care provided by this service.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA
Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services.