Background to this inspection
Updated
9 March 2023
The inspection
We carried out this performance review and assessment under Section 46 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act). We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements of the regulations associated with the Act and looked at the quality of the service to provide a rating.
Unlike our standard approach to assessing performance, we did not physically visit the office of the location. This is a new approach we have introduced to reviewing and assessing performance of some care at home providers. Instead of visiting the office location we use technology such as electronic file sharing and video or phone calls to engage with people using the service and staff.
Inspection team
This inspection was carried out by an inspector, an assistant inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.
Service and service type
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats.
Registered Manager
This provider is required to have a registered manager to oversee the delivery of regulated activities at this location. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Registered managers and providers are legally responsible for how the service is run, for the quality and safety of the care provided and compliance with regulations.
At the time of our inspection there was a registered manager in post.
Notice of inspection
We gave a short period notice of the inspection. This was because it is a small service and we needed to be sure that the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection.
Inspection activity started on 7 February 2023 and ended on 13 February 2023.
What we did before the inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service since they registered with CQC. We sought feedback from the local authority and professionals who work with the service. The provider was not asked to complete a Provider Information Return (PIR) prior to this inspection. A PIR is information providers send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We used information gathered as part of monitoring activity that took place on 20 June 2022 to help plan the inspection and inform our judgements. We used all this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
We spoke with 8 people and 4 relatives about their experience of the care provided. We also spoke with 8 members of staff including; the nominated individual/registered manager, administrator, and 6 care assistants. The nominated individual is responsible for supervising the management of the service on behalf of the provider.
We reviewed a range of records. This included 4 people's care records and 2 staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision.
This performance review and assessment was carried out without a visit to the location’s office. We used technology such as telephone calls to enable us to engage with people using the service and staff, and electronic file sharing to enable us to review documentation.
Updated
9 March 2023
About the service
Dependable Health Care Ltd is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of our inspection the service was providing personal care to 30 people, this included older people and people living with physical disabilities.
Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
Risks to people were not always adequately assessed or managed. Medicines were not always managed safely. There were enough staff to meet people’s needs, but not always to achieve consistency for people. The service worked in partnership with health and social care professionals, however advice was not consistently recorded in people’s care plans. People and their relatives were involved in assessing and reviewing care however, people’s care records were not always person centred.
Quality assurance systems were in place, but they were not always robust or effective. Processes were not in place to assess the quality of audits being carried out.
Systems were in place to safeguard people from the risk of abuse. People and their relatives consistently told us the service was safe. Recruitment practices were safe and there was a system in place to record, respond to and learn from accidents and incidents.
People's needs were assessed prior to their support commencing and outcomes identified. Staff received regular supervisions and ongoing training, to ensure they had the right knowledge to support people effectively.
People were treated well by kind and caring staff, who supported people to maintain their privacy, dignity and independence. The provider had a suitable system in place to manage and respond to complaints.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
At the time of the inspection, the location did not care or support for anyone with a learning disability or an autistic person. However, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk
Rating at last inspection
This service was registered with us on 10 October 2020 and this is the first inspection.
Why we inspected
This inspection was prompted by a review of the information we held about this service.
Enforcement and Recommendations
We have identified breaches in relation to safe care and treatment, medicine management and good governance at this inspection. Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.
We have also made a recommendation about improvements in the content of care plan records.
Follow up
We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.
This was an ‘inspection using remote technology’. This means we did not visit the office location and instead used technology such as electronic file sharing to gather information, and video and phone calls to engage with people using the service as part of this performance review and assessment.