• Hospital
  • NHS hospital

Nottingham City Hospital

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Hucknall Road, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 1PB (0115) 969 1169

Provided and run by:
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Report from 4 June 2024 assessment

Ratings - Maternity

  • Overall

    Requires improvement

  • Safe

    Requires improvement

  • Effective

    Good

  • Caring

    Good

  • Responsive

    Good

  • Well-led

    Requires improvement

Our view of the service

Date of assessment 4 June 2024.

We carried out this assessment following information of concern shared by staff in maternity at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust.

We inspected 26 quality statements across the safe, effective, caring, and well-led key questions and have combined the scores for these areas with scores from the last inspection to give the rating.

We identified 4 breaches of regulation in safe care and treatment.

There was a safety culture where events were investigated. However, learning was not always embedded to promote good practice. Staff tried to provide safe care and treatment. However, many of the pathways and systems were currently in the process of being introduced. When the department was busy, leaders reviewed staffing levels to meet the needs of their patients. However, this was not always possible due to numbers of sufficiently qualified staff.

Staff delivered good care and treatment following evidence based practice, and people mostly had good outcomes. Staff were kind, caring and compassionate. People could mostly access care and treatment when they needed it. The maternity leaders were working to improve governance and risk management and were continuing to address the negative culture that remained in some areas.

People's experience of this service

During our onsite assessment, patients and any family or carers with them were mostly positive about the staff treating them, with warmth and kindness and providing effective care and treatment. They said they were seen quickly, upon arrival, by trained midwifery staff to find out more about why they had attended. While the people we spoke with expressed that they were generally happy with their care, our assessment found care / elements of care did not meet the expected standards.

Patient records we reviewed onsite showed they were not always receiving triage or induction promptly, and staff were not always on hand if they were needed for help or support. However, information provided off site identified overall positive trends in both triage and induction.

Most people said they did not feel anxious about raising concerns. Most said communication with them was good, but some people said they would have appreciated more information.