• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Radis Community Care (Jubilee Court)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Jubilee Court, Edison Road, Stafford, Staffordshire, ST16 3NG (01785) 248937

Provided and run by:
G P Homecare Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 3 July 2019

The inspection:

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team:

The inspection was carried out by an inspector, an assistant inspector and an expert by experience. An expert by experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

Service and service type:

This service provides care to people living in specialist 'extra care' housing. Extra care housing is purpose-built or adapted accommodation in a shared site or building. The accommodation is rented and is the occupant's own home. People's care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for extra care housing; this inspection looked at people's

personal care service. People using the service lived in flats, on the purpose built development. There were 21 people receiving personal care at the time of the inspection.

Not everyone using Radis Community care (Jubilee Court) receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with 'personal care'; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection:

We gave the service 48 hours' notice of the inspection because we needed to gather people's contact details

and gain their permission to contact them as part of the inspection.

Inspection site visit activity started and ended on 22 May 2019. We visited the office location on this date to see the manager and office staff; and to review care records and policies and procedures. We also made telephone calls to people who used the service on this date.

What we did:

We used the information we held about the service to formulate our inspection plan. This included statutory notifications that the provider had sent to us. A statutory notification is information about important events which the provider is required to send us by law. We used information the provider sent us in the Provider Information Return (PIR). This is information we require providers to send us at least once annually to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.

During the inspection, we spoke with three people who used the service and four relatives. We also spoke with the registered manager, two senior team leaders and two care staff. We reviewed the care records of three people to see whether they were accurate and up to date. These included care plans, daily care records and medicine administration records. We looked at records relating to the management of the service. These included two staff recruitment records, incident records, training information, complaints and compliments records and quality assurance records.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 3 July 2019

About the service: Radis Community Care (Jubilee Court) is an extra care housing service that was providing personal care to 21 people at the time of the inspection.

People’s experience of using this service: People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Risks were assessed and reviewed to ensure people were kept safe. Medication was administered safely. People were supported by a sufficient number of safely recruited staff who knew how to keep people safe.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff were trained and supported to deliver effective care. People’s needs and choices were assessed and staff delivered support in the way people preferred.

People were supported by kind and caring staff. People were encouraged to be involved in making decisions about their care. People were supported by staff who respected their privacy and dignity and promoted their independence.

Staff understood people’s preferences and catered for these. People’s end of life wishes were considered when needed and plans were in place to ensure people received personalised care at that time of their life.

Audits were in place that effectively checked the quality of the service. People and staff told us they found the management team approachable. The management team continually sought ways to improve the quality of the service.

The service met the characteristics of Good in all areas; more information is available in the full report.

Rating at last inspection: At the last inspection the service was rated Good (report published 2 December 2016). At this inspection we found the service continued to be good.

Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection based on the rating at the last inspection.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor the service through the information we receive.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk